https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200475 A later statute and a notification declaring a Gurdwara to be a Notified Sikh Gurdwara did not, without clear words or necessary implication, extinguish a vested right of appeal arising from a suit instituted earlier. The High Court therefore retained jurisdiction over the pending appeal, although it could not reopen matters conclusively settled by the statutory status of the Gurdwara under Section 3(4). Sections 29 and 32 were construed as governing original suits or proceedings, not appeals, so they did not require pending appeals to be sent to the Tribunal or otherwise oust appellate jurisdiction. The Tribunal procedure was confined to first-instance matters. en-us Sat, 23 Jun 1928 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Mar 2018 18:49:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200475 A later statute and a notification declaring a Gurdwara to be a Notified Sikh Gurdwara did not, without clear words or necessary implication, extinguish a vested right of appeal arising from a suit instituted earlier. The High Court therefore retained jurisdiction over the pending appeal, although it could not reopen matters conclusively settled by the statutory status of the Gurdwara under Section 3(4). Sections 29 and 32 were construed as governing original suits or proceedings, not appeals, so they did not require pending appeals to be sent to the Tribunal or otherwise oust appellate jurisdiction. The Tribunal procedure was confined to first-instance matters. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 23 Jun 1928 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200475