<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (10) TMI 27 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12513</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the appeal on the interpretation of rule 115 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming entitlement to benefits under the rule and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contention that it does not apply to remittances outside India. The appeal was dismissed due to the Revenue&#039;s unsubstantiated position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 17:40:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (10) TMI 27 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12513</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the appeal on the interpretation of rule 115 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming entitlement to benefits under the rule and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contention that it does not apply to remittances outside India. The appeal was dismissed due to the Revenue&#039;s unsubstantiated position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>