https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200473 The Court held that it had jurisdiction as part of the cause of action arose where the termination order was served. The Company was deemed a "State" under Article 12 due to significant government control. Regulation 2.18 allowing termination was found illegal and void for being arbitrary. Consequently, the termination order based on this regulation was also deemed illegal, leading to the petitioner's reinstatement with full back wages and service continuity. The ruling stressed adherence to natural justice principles and constitutional safeguards under Articles 14 and 16. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Mar 2018 17:32:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200473 The Court held that it had jurisdiction as part of the cause of action arose where the termination order was served. The Company was deemed a "State" under Article 12 due to significant government control. Regulation 2.18 allowing termination was found illegal and void for being arbitrary. Consequently, the termination order based on this regulation was also deemed illegal, leading to the petitioner's reinstatement with full back wages and service continuity. The ruling stressed adherence to natural justice principles and constitutional safeguards under Articles 14 and 16. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Oct 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200473