<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12509</link>
    <description>The court held that the revision application under section 264 of the Income-tax Act was not maintainable as the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with section 249(4)(a). It was determined that once the appeal was chosen, the remedy of revision was barred, as per the legal provisions and precedents cited. The court emphasized that findings in the revision order would not affect the petitioner if pursuing the appeal remedy. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 22 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12509</link>
      <description>The court held that the revision application under section 264 of the Income-tax Act was not maintainable as the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance with section 249(4)(a). It was determined that once the appeal was chosen, the remedy of revision was barred, as per the legal provisions and precedents cited. The court emphasized that findings in the revision order would not affect the petitioner if pursuing the appeal remedy. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>