<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Supreme Court Rules on Arbitral Award Validity: Family Representative&#039;s Acceptance Binds All Members to Time Limits.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38653</link>
    <description>Validity of Arbitral Award - time limitation - Having accepted the award through Anilkumar Patel, being the head of the family, appellant Nos. 1(a) to 1(d) and respondent No.10 cannot turn round and contend that they had not received the copy of the award - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 12:59:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 12:59:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Supreme Court Rules on Arbitral Award Validity: Family Representative&#039;s Acceptance Binds All Members to Time Limits.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38653</link>
      <description>Validity of Arbitral Award - time limitation - Having accepted the award through Anilkumar Patel, being the head of the family, appellant Nos. 1(a) to 1(d) and respondent No.10 cannot turn round and contend that they had not received the copy of the award - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 12:59:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>