<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 363 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200464</link>
    <description>Under Article 165, the Governor may determine the Advocate-General&#039;s remuneration, and where the appointment terms contemplate amendment from time to time, the fee structure is not immutable. The revised notification rationalised fees for batch matters and cases covered by earlier judgments, and there was no legal basis to insist on the earlier scale continuing unchanged during tenure. The amendment was therefore within competence and valid, with pending fee claims governed by the amended notification. The Advocate-General was required to submit revised bills accordingly, and payment was restricted to the revised scale with interest as directed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 12:57:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 363 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200464</link>
      <description>Under Article 165, the Governor may determine the Advocate-General&#039;s remuneration, and where the appointment terms contemplate amendment from time to time, the fee structure is not immutable. The revised notification rationalised fees for batch matters and cases covered by earlier judgments, and there was no legal basis to insist on the earlier scale continuing unchanged during tenure. The amendment was therefore within competence and valid, with pending fee claims governed by the amended notification. The Advocate-General was required to submit revised bills accordingly, and payment was restricted to the revised scale with interest as directed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>