https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200463 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is limited to correcting grave illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error, and cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or act as an appellate forum. The Supreme Court noted that the fact-finding authorities had examined the material on subletting and related possession issues, and their findings were not shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence. A High Court therefore exceeded its constitutional limits by upsetting concurrent findings and venturing into an ownership question outside the lis. The Court also stressed that a writ petition under Article 227 should not be entertained after extreme delay and laches, especially after withdrawal of a delayed statutory appeal without bona fide explanation. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jun 2020 17:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200463 Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction is limited to correcting grave illegality, perversity or jurisdictional error, and cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or act as an appellate forum. The Supreme Court noted that the fact-finding authorities had examined the material on subletting and related possession issues, and their findings were not shown to be perverse or unsupported by evidence. A High Court therefore exceeded its constitutional limits by upsetting concurrent findings and venturing into an ownership question outside the lis. The Court also stressed that a writ petition under Article 227 should not be entertained after extreme delay and laches, especially after withdrawal of a delayed statutory appeal without bona fide explanation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200463