https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200460 The Court refused interim injunctions in a case involving the appointment of a Commissioner for document seizure, restraining meetings and office-bearers, and challenging the validity of office-bearers' election due to alleged irregularities. The plaintiff's conduct of acquiescence and failure to object during the election were deemed objectionable. The Court found the balance of convenience favored the defendants, as halting the Chamber's functions would cause chaos. The suit was directed for trial within two months, with specific timelines set, and the interim injunctions were vacated without costs. en-us Mon, 03 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Mar 2018 12:13:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200460 The Court refused interim injunctions in a case involving the appointment of a Commissioner for document seizure, restraining meetings and office-bearers, and challenging the validity of office-bearers' election due to alleged irregularities. The plaintiff's conduct of acquiescence and failure to object during the election were deemed objectionable. The Court found the balance of convenience favored the defendants, as halting the Chamber's functions would cause chaos. The suit was directed for trial within two months, with specific timelines set, and the interim injunctions were vacated without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Jul 1967 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200460