https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357765 The court declined to address the disputed factual questions regarding the notice of reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2010-2011 in a writ petition. It emphasized that these issues should be examined in regular assessments by the authorities. The court clarified that all contentions of the petitioner on the validity of the notice remained open. The Assessing Officer's decision on the petitioner's objection would not preclude the petitioner from arguing that the notice was sent to the wrong address, leading to the expiration of the time limit for issuance of the notice. The petition was disposed of, allowing for further review in departmental proceedings. en-us Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Mar 2018 11:07:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357765 The court declined to address the disputed factual questions regarding the notice of reopening of assessment for the assessment year 2010-2011 in a writ petition. It emphasized that these issues should be examined in regular assessments by the authorities. The court clarified that all contentions of the petitioner on the validity of the notice remained open. The Assessing Officer's decision on the petitioner's objection would not preclude the petitioner from arguing that the notice was sent to the wrong address, leading to the expiration of the time limit for issuance of the notice. The petition was disposed of, allowing for further review in departmental proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 14 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357765