https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200447 In supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227, the Court must confine itself to the subject matter of the challenge and cannot issue incidental directions on matters outside the lis. A concession by counsel does not bind a cooperative society or its members on substantive rights unless specifically authorised by the client, and authority cannot be presumed from mere appearance. The impugned directions based on the unauthorised concession were therefore set aside, while the findings upholding the expulsion from membership remained undisturbed. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200447 In supervisory jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227, the Court must confine itself to the subject matter of the challenge and cannot issue incidental directions on matters outside the lis. A concession by counsel does not bind a cooperative society or its members on substantive rights unless specifically authorised by the client, and authority cannot be presumed from mere appearance. The impugned directions based on the unauthorised concession were therefore set aside, while the findings upholding the expulsion from membership remained undisturbed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200447