<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1441 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357738</link>
    <description>The appeal was partially allowed, with the penalty amount reduced to Rs. 6,00,000, providing relief to the appellant for the balance. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, holding the appellant guilty of mis-declaration but considered the circumstances of the first offense and acceptance of guilt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 07:30:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1441 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357738</link>
      <description>The appeal was partially allowed, with the penalty amount reduced to Rs. 6,00,000, providing relief to the appellant for the balance. The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, holding the appellant guilty of mis-declaration but considered the circumstances of the first offense and acceptance of guilt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>