<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1432 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357729</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, waiving the penalty imposed on the appellant for not maintaining separate accounts for input services as required by Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant had voluntarily reversed the credits before the show cause notice, which the Tribunal deemed a reasonable cause for the delayed reversal, setting aside the penalty under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 07:29:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1432 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357729</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, waiving the penalty imposed on the appellant for not maintaining separate accounts for input services as required by Rule 6 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The appellant had voluntarily reversed the credits before the show cause notice, which the Tribunal deemed a reasonable cause for the delayed reversal, setting aside the penalty under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357729</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>