https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357728 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting a complete waiver of the pre-deposit of service tax demand and Cenvat credit demand. It held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax under Franchisee Services, as the activity did not fall under this category. The Tribunal also found that the appellant did not exceed the credit limit and invalidated the grounds for denying Cenvat credit based on invoice discrepancies. The requirement of pre-deposit was waived until the final disposal of the appeal, and the miscellaneous application for an early hearing was disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Mar 2018 07:29:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357728 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting a complete waiver of the pre-deposit of service tax demand and Cenvat credit demand. It held that the appellant was not liable to pay service tax under Franchisee Services, as the activity did not fall under this category. The Tribunal also found that the appellant did not exceed the credit limit and invalidated the grounds for denying Cenvat credit based on invoice discrepancies. The requirement of pre-deposit was waived until the final disposal of the appeal, and the miscellaneous application for an early hearing was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357728