<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1428 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357725</link>
    <description>Service tax under the reverse charge mechanism was held inapplicable to GTA services rendered within Jammu and Kashmir because Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 did not extend to that territory. As the levy itself had no territorial operation there, the recipient could not be fastened with reverse charge liability for such services. The demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2018 07:29:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1428 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357725</link>
      <description>Service tax under the reverse charge mechanism was held inapplicable to GTA services rendered within Jammu and Kashmir because Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 did not extend to that territory. As the levy itself had no territorial operation there, the recipient could not be fastened with reverse charge liability for such services. The demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>