https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357722 The High Court upheld CESTAT's order directing the appellant to make specific deposits despite acknowledging the appellant's arguments regarding already paid duty and the harshness of the predeposit requirement due to unit closures. The Court found CESTAT's exercise of discretion reasonable and extended the deposit deadline by six weeks. Failure to comply within the extended timeframe would lead to dismissal of appeals. The Court disposed of the appeals and related applications without imposing costs on either party. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 29 Mar 2018 07:28:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357722 The High Court upheld CESTAT's order directing the appellant to make specific deposits despite acknowledging the appellant's arguments regarding already paid duty and the harshness of the predeposit requirement due to unit closures. The Court found CESTAT's exercise of discretion reasonable and extended the deposit deadline by six weeks. Failure to comply within the extended timeframe would lead to dismissal of appeals. The Court disposed of the appeals and related applications without imposing costs on either party. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357722