<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1419 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357716</link>
    <description>A one-day delay in filing the statement required under an exemption notification was treated as a procedural lapse rather than a substantive breach. The filing requirement formed part of the procedural machinery for availing self-credit under the exemption scheme, and where the notification language matched earlier Tribunal precedent, delayed compliance was not regarded as fatal if the assessee was otherwise eligible. On that basis, the short delay did not justify forfeiture of the option to take credit on own account or denial of the notification benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1419 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357716</link>
      <description>A one-day delay in filing the statement required under an exemption notification was treated as a procedural lapse rather than a substantive breach. The filing requirement formed part of the procedural machinery for availing self-credit under the exemption scheme, and where the notification language matched earlier Tribunal precedent, delayed compliance was not regarded as fatal if the assessee was otherwise eligible. On that basis, the short delay did not justify forfeiture of the option to take credit on own account or denial of the notification benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357716</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>