https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200439 In pre-emption, the pre-emptor acquires only the rights available to the vendee, and the vendee is not treated as guaranteeing the vendor's title. A decree and payment of pre-emption money could not be reopened merely because the property was later claimed as evacuee property, where no fraud was established and the Custodian's action arose after the decree and deposit. A challenge to the constitutional validity of the pre-emption right could not be raised by a party who had invoked that right, and the asserted lack of jurisdiction was not substantiated. The deposited money was not recoverable when possession later became unavailable. en-us Fri, 18 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:45:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200439 In pre-emption, the pre-emptor acquires only the rights available to the vendee, and the vendee is not treated as guaranteeing the vendor's title. A decree and payment of pre-emption money could not be reopened merely because the property was later claimed as evacuee property, where no fraud was established and the Custodian's action arose after the decree and deposit. A challenge to the constitutional validity of the pre-emption right could not be raised by a party who had invoked that right, and the asserted lack of jurisdiction was not substantiated. The deposited money was not recoverable when possession later became unavailable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200439