<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1885 (2) TMI 1 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200438</link>
    <description>Section 24 of the Bengal Civil Courts Act required application of Muhammadan law of pre-emption where the pre-emptor and vendor were Muhammadans and the right originated under that law. The Court treated pre-emption as a legal incident of ownership under Muhammadan jurisprudence, not a mere right of repurchase, and held that the vendee&#039;s non-Muhammadan status did not, by itself, exclude the rule. The earlier approach limiting enforcement to justice, equity and good conscience was not accepted for a right arising under Muhammadan law. The referred question was answered in favour of the pre-emptor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 1885 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 17:41:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1885 (2) TMI 1 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200438</link>
      <description>Section 24 of the Bengal Civil Courts Act required application of Muhammadan law of pre-emption where the pre-emptor and vendor were Muhammadans and the right originated under that law. The Court treated pre-emption as a legal incident of ownership under Muhammadan jurisprudence, not a mere right of repurchase, and held that the vendee&#039;s non-Muhammadan status did not, by itself, exclude the rule. The earlier approach limiting enforcement to justice, equity and good conscience was not accepted for a right arising under Muhammadan law. The referred question was answered in favour of the pre-emptor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 1885 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>