<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 627 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200435</link>
    <description>Unpaid protection and indemnity insurance premium was treated as a maritime claim falling within &quot;necessaries supplied to any ship&quot;, because necessaries were construed broadly to include commercially indispensable services in modern maritime trade. An order refusing to reject a plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) was treated as a preliminary judgment appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, since it finally decides the limited rejection issue. A plaint alleging sister-ship liability and beneficial ownership was read as a whole and held to disclose a triable cause of action, so it could not be rejected at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515055" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 627 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200435</link>
      <description>Unpaid protection and indemnity insurance premium was treated as a maritime claim falling within &quot;necessaries supplied to any ship&quot;, because necessaries were construed broadly to include commercially indispensable services in modern maritime trade. An order refusing to reject a plaint under Order 7 Rule 11(a) was treated as a preliminary judgment appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, since it finally decides the limited rejection issue. A plaint alleging sister-ship liability and beneficial ownership was read as a whole and held to disclose a triable cause of action, so it could not be rejected at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>