<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1930 (7) TMI 15 - BEFORE THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200433</link>
    <description>A testamentary clause was construed according to its plain and natural meaning, with the defeasance provision treated as operating if the son died during the mother&#039;s lifetime rather than only in limited circumstances. On that construction, the widow took an absolute interest in the relevant one-half share, and the other widow had no interest in it. On limitation, time began to run only when the asserted right was infringed or clearly threatened; because no hostile assertion was shown until the later proceedings, the suit was held to be within time. The widow&#039;s appeal succeeded, the opposing appeal failed, and the matter was remitted for implementation of the declaration and partition directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 16:38:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=515049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1930 (7) TMI 15 - BEFORE THE PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200433</link>
      <description>A testamentary clause was construed according to its plain and natural meaning, with the defeasance provision treated as operating if the son died during the mother&#039;s lifetime rather than only in limited circumstances. On that construction, the widow took an absolute interest in the relevant one-half share, and the other widow had no interest in it. On limitation, time began to run only when the asserted right was infringed or clearly threatened; because no hostile assertion was shown until the later proceedings, the suit was held to be within time. The widow&#039;s appeal succeeded, the opposing appeal failed, and the matter was remitted for implementation of the declaration and partition directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 1930 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>