https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200423 Enhanced legal benefit fund contribution was disputed on the ground that the Tribunal required payment of an additional 0.5%. The HC did not decide the rival merits, but followed a similar course to protect both parties by allowing the appeal to proceed on condition that the petitioner execute a simple bond without sureties for the disputed excess amount. The original petition was disposed of with conditional relief, and the appeal was directed to be considered and decided on merits after compliance with the bond requirement. en-us Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2018 08:07:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200423 Enhanced legal benefit fund contribution was disputed on the ground that the Tribunal required payment of an additional 0.5%. The HC did not decide the rival merits, but followed a similar course to protect both parties by allowing the appeal to proceed on condition that the petitioner execute a simple bond without sureties for the disputed excess amount. The original petition was disposed of with conditional relief, and the appeal was directed to be considered and decided on merits after compliance with the bond requirement. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200423