<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Rules Benami Transactions Act, 1988, Doesn&#039;t Justify Rejection of 1972 Property Suit at Initial Stage.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38632</link>
    <description>The property was held in fiduciary capacity - Whether the provisions of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, would apply to a transaction of the year 1972 is another matter, but, in view of pleadings in the suit filed by respondent No.1, it cannot be said that this could be a ground for rejection of the plaint at the threshold - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:58:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:58:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Rules Benami Transactions Act, 1988, Doesn&#039;t Justify Rejection of 1972 Property Suit at Initial Stage.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38632</link>
      <description>The property was held in fiduciary capacity - Whether the provisions of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988, would apply to a transaction of the year 1972 is another matter, but, in view of pleadings in the suit filed by respondent No.1, it cannot be said that this could be a ground for rejection of the plaint at the threshold - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:58:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>