https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357693 The High Court of Madras ruled on a Writ Petition seeking a mandamus for the clearance of imported RBD Palmolein. The court referred to a Supreme Court judgment emphasizing the mandatory conditions for bringing a notification into force. It was found that the notification in question was not validly enforced as it was offered for sale after the goods were cleared. Consequently, the court disposed of the Writ Petition, allowing the petitioner to seek remedy before appropriate authorities in accordance with the referenced judgment. The case highlights the importance of procedural compliance for valid notifications and adherence to legal precedents. en-us Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:58:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357693 The High Court of Madras ruled on a Writ Petition seeking a mandamus for the clearance of imported RBD Palmolein. The court referred to a Supreme Court judgment emphasizing the mandatory conditions for bringing a notification into force. It was found that the notification in question was not validly enforced as it was offered for sale after the goods were cleared. Consequently, the court disposed of the Writ Petition, allowing the petitioner to seek remedy before appropriate authorities in accordance with the referenced judgment. The case highlights the importance of procedural compliance for valid notifications and adherence to legal precedents. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357693