https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357690 The Judge found that the appellant did not import prohibited or restricted goods but faced irregularity in biological criteria compliance due to testing delays and potential sample contamination. The lack of mala-fide intent was highlighted, supported by a certificate of analysis from the load port. Consequently, the order of confiscation and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant, emphasizing compliance with standards and permissions under relevant regulations. en-us Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Mar 2019 14:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357690 The Judge found that the appellant did not import prohibited or restricted goods but faced irregularity in biological criteria compliance due to testing delays and potential sample contamination. The lack of mala-fide intent was highlighted, supported by a certificate of analysis from the load port. Consequently, the order of confiscation and penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellant, emphasizing compliance with standards and permissions under relevant regulations. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357690