<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1389 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357686</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Service Tax demand on cold storage charges in the context of C&amp;amp;F services. It clarified that providing only forwarding services without clearing services does not constitute taxable C&amp;amp;F services, as per relevant case law. The judgment emphasized that to be considered a C&amp;amp;F agent, one must offer both clearing and forwarding services simultaneously, as established by the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court judgment upheld by the Supreme Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1389 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357686</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Service Tax demand on cold storage charges in the context of C&amp;amp;F services. It clarified that providing only forwarding services without clearing services does not constitute taxable C&amp;amp;F services, as per relevant case law. The judgment emphasized that to be considered a C&amp;amp;F agent, one must offer both clearing and forwarding services simultaneously, as established by the Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court judgment upheld by the Supreme Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357686</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>