<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1384 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357681</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the service tax liability and valuation disputes related to the provision of Multi-Purpose Support Vessel (MSV) and management services on offshore supply vessels. It held that the appellant&#039;s services fell under the supply of tangible goods category effective from 16/05/2008, not under business support services. The Tribunal upheld the eligibility of the appellant for abatement under Notification 12/2003, finding no grounds to challenge the Original Authority&#039;s decision. Penalty under Section 78 was waived due to the appellant&#039;s lack of intentional evasion, attributing the delay in payment to factors beyond their control. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:58:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1384 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357681</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the service tax liability and valuation disputes related to the provision of Multi-Purpose Support Vessel (MSV) and management services on offshore supply vessels. It held that the appellant&#039;s services fell under the supply of tangible goods category effective from 16/05/2008, not under business support services. The Tribunal upheld the eligibility of the appellant for abatement under Notification 12/2003, finding no grounds to challenge the Original Authority&#039;s decision. Penalty under Section 78 was waived due to the appellant&#039;s lack of intentional evasion, attributing the delay in payment to factors beyond their control. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>