https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357676 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to drop the duty demand and penalty against the appellant due to insufficient evidence supporting charges of clandestine removal of excisable goods. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of material evidence proving the appellant's involvement in clandestine activities, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The appeal was deemed meritless as the evidence provided did not substantiate the alleged wrongdoing, affirming the impugned order. en-us Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:58:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357676 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to drop the duty demand and penalty against the appellant due to insufficient evidence supporting charges of clandestine removal of excisable goods. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of material evidence proving the appellant's involvement in clandestine activities, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. The appeal was deemed meritless as the evidence provided did not substantiate the alleged wrongdoing, affirming the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357676