<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order due to the lack of merit. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the insufficiency of evidence to substantiate the allegations of clandestine removal of goods, leading to the dismissal of duty demands and confiscation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:57:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1378 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order due to the lack of merit. The appeal was allowed, highlighting the insufficiency of evidence to substantiate the allegations of clandestine removal of goods, leading to the dismissal of duty demands and confiscation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>