https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357674 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand imposed on the appellant for excess scrap generation during specific years, as the Department failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove clandestine removal of goods without payment of Central Excise duty. The appellant's defense regarding raw material quality and labor skill influencing scrap generation was considered valid, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357674 The Tribunal set aside the duty demand imposed on the appellant for excess scrap generation during specific years, as the Department failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove clandestine removal of goods without payment of Central Excise duty. The appellant's defense regarding raw material quality and labor skill influencing scrap generation was considered valid, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357674