<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1374 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357671</link>
    <description>Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 for export-related credit was held not to be governed by the strict limitation regime in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, because that provision&#039;s relevant-date framework did not specifically cover this category of refund. The date of export could not automatically be treated as the starting point for limitation in such claims. The rejection of the refund as time-barred was therefore unsustainable, and the refund could not be denied on limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:57:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1374 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357671</link>
      <description>Refund of accumulated Cenvat credit under Rule 5 for export-related credit was held not to be governed by the strict limitation regime in Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, because that provision&#039;s relevant-date framework did not specifically cover this category of refund. The date of export could not automatically be treated as the starting point for limitation in such claims. The rejection of the refund as time-barred was therefore unsustainable, and the refund could not be denied on limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>