<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1364 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357661</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the inclusion of pearls and stones in the net wealth for wealth tax assessment, determining that they fall within the definition of asset/jewellery/semi-precious stones as per the Wealth Tax Act. The tribunal considered loose pearls and stones as includible under the definition of gemstones, even if not embedded in jewelry. The appeal challenging this inclusion was dismissed, emphasizing that semi-precious stones, including pearls, are liable for wealth tax. Additionally, the tribunal affirmed the levy of interest under specified sections of the Wealth Tax Act, dismissing the appeal on these grounds as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 07:57:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514928" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1364 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357661</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the inclusion of pearls and stones in the net wealth for wealth tax assessment, determining that they fall within the definition of asset/jewellery/semi-precious stones as per the Wealth Tax Act. The tribunal considered loose pearls and stones as includible under the definition of gemstones, even if not embedded in jewelry. The appeal challenging this inclusion was dismissed, emphasizing that semi-precious stones, including pearls, are liable for wealth tax. Additionally, the tribunal affirmed the levy of interest under specified sections of the Wealth Tax Act, dismissing the appeal on these grounds as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>