https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200408 The court dismissed all writ petitions, upholding the validity of food quality standards, legislative competence, and the appointments of the Public Analyst and Food Inspectors. It affirmed that a firm could be prosecuted under the proviso to Section 16(1). The issues concerning white pepper standards and allegations against a specific individual were referred to the trial court for resolution. Parties were instructed to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate on November 15, 1969. en-us Fri, 10 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:45:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200408 The court dismissed all writ petitions, upholding the validity of food quality standards, legislative competence, and the appointments of the Public Analyst and Food Inspectors. It affirmed that a firm could be prosecuted under the proviso to Section 16(1). The issues concerning white pepper standards and allegations against a specific individual were referred to the trial court for resolution. Parties were instructed to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate on November 15, 1969. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Oct 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200408