https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200406 The court partially allowed the application under section 446 of the Companies Act, granting leave to Deutsche Bank to file a suit against a company and a guarantor in the Bombay High Court. The court emphasized that the company court has jurisdiction to entertain suits involving the company and third parties post winding-up order, without limitations on the nature of the suit. The judgment highlighted the wide discretion of the court to grant permission for such suits, rejecting the argument that jurisdiction was restricted in cases involving both the company and third parties. en-us Thu, 25 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 18:18:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200406 The court partially allowed the application under section 446 of the Companies Act, granting leave to Deutsche Bank to file a suit against a company and a guarantor in the Bombay High Court. The court emphasized that the company court has jurisdiction to entertain suits involving the company and third parties post winding-up order, without limitations on the nature of the suit. The judgment highlighted the wide discretion of the court to grant permission for such suits, rejecting the argument that jurisdiction was restricted in cases involving both the company and third parties. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 25 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200406