https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200398 The court dismissed the petitions based on the precedent set by a Division Bench judgment in the Ami Pigment Pvt. Ltd. case, which allowed set off for tax paid on the purchase of processing material. The Tribunal's decision to grant the set off for the use of LDO in manufacturing M.S. Patta Patti was upheld, as the issue was deemed settled by the Division Bench's ruling. The court found no grounds to overturn the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the lack of contradictory decisions presented by the Assistant Government Pleader to challenge the reliance on the precedent. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:34:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200398 The court dismissed the petitions based on the precedent set by a Division Bench judgment in the Ami Pigment Pvt. Ltd. case, which allowed set off for tax paid on the purchase of processing material. The Tribunal's decision to grant the set off for the use of LDO in manufacturing M.S. Patta Patti was upheld, as the issue was deemed settled by the Division Bench's ruling. The court found no grounds to overturn the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing the lack of contradictory decisions presented by the Assistant Government Pleader to challenge the reliance on the precedent. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200398