https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200393 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, dismissing the suit filed by the first respondent. The appellant was held entitled to the benefits of Section 17(2A)(b) and protection under Section 17(4) of the West Bengal Premises Act, 1956. The court found the delayed rent payments to be of a technical nature and did not warrant striking out the defense. Petitions for impleadment were dismissed, and parties were ordered to bear their respective costs. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200393 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, dismissing the suit filed by the first respondent. The appellant was held entitled to the benefits of Section 17(2A)(b) and protection under Section 17(4) of the West Bengal Premises Act, 1956. The court found the delayed rent payments to be of a technical nature and did not warrant striking out the defense. Petitions for impleadment were dismissed, and parties were ordered to bear their respective costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Mar 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200393