https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200392 Documents once admitted in evidence cannot later be excluded for want of proper stamping after the trial court has applied its mind to stamp duty and penalty. Section 36 of the Stamp Act makes such admission conclusive, subject only to the limited exception under section 61, and the issue cannot be reopened in appeal or revision on the ground of insufficient stamping. Where execution is also admitted by the executant, no further proof is required if proof is otherwise necessary. The objection to admissibility on stamping therefore fails once the documents have been formally admitted. en-us Tue, 25 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 16:01:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200392 Documents once admitted in evidence cannot later be excluded for want of proper stamping after the trial court has applied its mind to stamp duty and penalty. Section 36 of the Stamp Act makes such admission conclusive, subject only to the limited exception under section 61, and the issue cannot be reopened in appeal or revision on the ground of insufficient stamping. Where execution is also admitted by the executant, no further proof is required if proof is otherwise necessary. The objection to admissibility on stamping therefore fails once the documents have been formally admitted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200392