https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200388 The High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition as it can interfere if an administrative body acts without jurisdiction. The court quashed the Collector's reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, stating it lacked jurisdiction as there was no actual dispute over compensation apportionment. The petitioner was deemed entitled to receive the compensation awarded, as the Government's doubts did not constitute a valid dispute. The court allowed the petition, quashed the reference, and directed the respondents to pay the compensation to the petitioner, with each party bearing their own costs. en-us Wed, 16 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:18:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200388 The High Court had jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition as it can interfere if an administrative body acts without jurisdiction. The court quashed the Collector's reference under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, stating it lacked jurisdiction as there was no actual dispute over compensation apportionment. The petitioner was deemed entitled to receive the compensation awarded, as the Government's doubts did not constitute a valid dispute. The court allowed the petition, quashed the reference, and directed the respondents to pay the compensation to the petitioner, with each party bearing their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200388