<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (9) TMI 69 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200386</link>
    <description>The court held that Natverlal is entitled to receive compensation for the acquired property as the sole heir of the deceased owner. The Reference made under Sections 18 and 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act was deemed valid, and the compensation was correctly deposited in court. The court ordered the Special Land Acquisition Officer to pay additional compensation with interest. Natverlal was allowed to withdraw the deposited amount, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:09:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (9) TMI 69 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200386</link>
      <description>The court held that Natverlal is entitled to receive compensation for the acquired property as the sole heir of the deceased owner. The Reference made under Sections 18 and 31(2) of the Land Acquisition Act was deemed valid, and the compensation was correctly deposited in court. The court ordered the Special Land Acquisition Officer to pay additional compensation with interest. Natverlal was allowed to withdraw the deposited amount, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>