<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1931 (3) TMI 29 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200383</link>
    <description>The judgment concluded that appeals to His Majesty in Council were incompetent and should be dismissed. The Board emphasized the finality of the Tribunal&#039;s award under the local Act, the non-applicability of future amendments to the Land Acquisition Act, and the intent to provide finality through the local code. The Secretary of State was ordered to pay five-sixths of the Society&#039;s taxed costs of the consolidated appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:31:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1931 (3) TMI 29 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200383</link>
      <description>The judgment concluded that appeals to His Majesty in Council were incompetent and should be dismissed. The Board emphasized the finality of the Tribunal&#039;s award under the local Act, the non-applicability of future amendments to the Land Acquisition Act, and the intent to provide finality through the local code. The Secretary of State was ordered to pay five-sixths of the Society&#039;s taxed costs of the consolidated appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1931 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>