https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200383 A special acquisition statute forming a self-contained code prevailed over the general Land Acquisition Act where it had incorporated only the provisions then in force and expressly limited appeals. The later insertion of section 26(2) into the general Act did not automatically extend to the local scheme, because amendments to a general law do not alter a special incorporated regime unless expressly adopted. The special finality provision therefore remained effective, and no further appeal to His Majesty in Council was competent. The consolidated appeals were barred. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 1931 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:31:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200383 A special acquisition statute forming a self-contained code prevailed over the general Land Acquisition Act where it had incorporated only the provisions then in force and expressly limited appeals. The later insertion of section 26(2) into the general Act did not automatically extend to the local scheme, because amendments to a general law do not alter a special incorporated regime unless expressly adopted. The special finality provision therefore remained effective, and no further appeal to His Majesty in Council was competent. The consolidated appeals were barred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Mar 1931 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200383