<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (10) TMI 217 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200382</link>
    <description>Pre-emptive transfer restrictions in articles require individual shareholder consent before shares may be transferred to an outsider or nominee; board attendance or representative participation does not constitute waiver. Transmission of a deceased shareholder&#039;s shares requires the executor&#039;s assent where no specific legacy exists, and any subsequent transfer remains subject to the articles&#039; transfer controls. Transactions structured to bypass those restrictions or foreign equity-dilution conditions may demonstrate lack of probity. In a closely held company with shareholder deadlock resembling a partnership arrangement, relief for oppression may include annulment of impugned resolutions, realignment of shareholding, management directions and a fresh general meeting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:21:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (10) TMI 217 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200382</link>
      <description>Pre-emptive transfer restrictions in articles require individual shareholder consent before shares may be transferred to an outsider or nominee; board attendance or representative participation does not constitute waiver. Transmission of a deceased shareholder&#039;s shares requires the executor&#039;s assent where no specific legacy exists, and any subsequent transfer remains subject to the articles&#039; transfer controls. Transactions structured to bypass those restrictions or foreign equity-dilution conditions may demonstrate lack of probity. In a closely held company with shareholder deadlock resembling a partnership arrangement, relief for oppression may include annulment of impugned resolutions, realignment of shareholding, management directions and a fresh general meeting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>