https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200373 For execution of a foreign decree under Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Bombay City Civil Court was treated as the "District Court" because the Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 and the jurisdictional notification vested it with exclusive original civil jurisdiction over the relevant class of matters and excluded the High Court's jurisdiction. The court held that, in that statutory setting, the City Civil Court answered the description of the principal civil court of original jurisdiction for such proceedings. The contrary view that execution could lie only on the High Court's Original Side was rejected, and the notice under Order 21 Rule 22 was upheld. en-us Mon, 01 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 11:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200373 For execution of a foreign decree under Section 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Bombay City Civil Court was treated as the "District Court" because the Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 and the jurisdictional notification vested it with exclusive original civil jurisdiction over the relevant class of matters and excluded the High Court's jurisdiction. The court held that, in that statutory setting, the City Civil Court answered the description of the principal civil court of original jurisdiction for such proceedings. The contrary view that execution could lie only on the High Court's Original Side was rejected, and the notice under Order 21 Rule 22 was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200373