https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200369 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that Tata Mills Limited's occupation of Bombay House was gratuitous and did not amount to an enforceable right under Section 3(2) of the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983. As a result, the Custodian was not authorized to take possession of any part of Bombay House. The petition was granted, and the respondents were restrained from attempting to seize control or possession of any area within Bombay House. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:52:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200369 The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, finding that Tata Mills Limited's occupation of Bombay House was gratuitous and did not amount to an enforceable right under Section 3(2) of the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983. As a result, the Custodian was not authorized to take possession of any part of Bombay House. The petition was granted, and the respondents were restrained from attempting to seize control or possession of any area within Bombay House. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200369