https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200369 A gratuitous licence to occupy an undivided portion of premises was not an enforceable proprietary right and could not be treated as a lease, tenancy, asset, power, authority or privilege of the textile undertaking. Section 3(2) of the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983, though broad, did not extend to a mere personal permission to occupy, so the Custodian could not lawfully take over possession or control of the premises on that basis. The demand for possession of an unspecified portion of the premises was therefore unsupported by authority, and relief was granted to the petitioners. en-us Tue, 20 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 10:52:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200369 A gratuitous licence to occupy an undivided portion of premises was not an enforceable proprietary right and could not be treated as a lease, tenancy, asset, power, authority or privilege of the textile undertaking. Section 3(2) of the Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1983, though broad, did not extend to a mere personal permission to occupy, so the Custodian could not lawfully take over possession or control of the premises on that basis. The demand for possession of an unspecified portion of the premises was therefore unsupported by authority, and relief was granted to the petitioners. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200369