<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 36 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12472</link>
    <description>The court examined whether interest was payable on amounts kept in deposit with Revenue authorities without appropriation towards tax liabilities. It was clarified that interest under the Income-tax Act is only payable in specific situations, such as refunds or penalties, and not on security deposits. The court held that the amount retained by the Income-tax Department as security deposit did not attract interest until appropriated towards tax liabilities, dismissing the appellant&#039;s argument for interest on excess amounts held in deposit. The judgment affirmed that no interest was payable on the deposit for the specified period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 36 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12472</link>
      <description>The court examined whether interest was payable on amounts kept in deposit with Revenue authorities without appropriation towards tax liabilities. It was clarified that interest under the Income-tax Act is only payable in specific situations, such as refunds or penalties, and not on security deposits. The court held that the amount retained by the Income-tax Department as security deposit did not attract interest until appropriated towards tax liabilities, dismissing the appellant&#039;s argument for interest on excess amounts held in deposit. The judgment affirmed that no interest was payable on the deposit for the specified period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>