<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Sub-Contract Expense Claims Disallowed Due to Lack of Supporting Bills u/s 37.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38620</link>
    <description>Disallowance towards mobilization of advances claimed by the assessee as sub-contract expenditure - no corresponding bills were raised against the assessee. In such circumstances, it is not possible to hold that the assessee actually incurred expenditure wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:21:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:21:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Sub-Contract Expense Claims Disallowed Due to Lack of Supporting Bills u/s 37.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38620</link>
      <description>Disallowance towards mobilization of advances claimed by the assessee as sub-contract expenditure - no corresponding bills were raised against the assessee. In such circumstances, it is not possible to hold that the assessee actually incurred expenditure wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:21:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>