https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357644 The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the cross objection of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the disallowance of commission paid to the Managing Director under Section 36(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on previous judgments. The disallowance of foreign travel expenses of directors was not justified as there was no family travel, and the excessive HRA paid to the Managing Director was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further consideration. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:22:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357644 The Revenue's appeal was dismissed, and the cross objection of the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision regarding the disallowance of commission paid to the Managing Director under Section 36(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based on previous judgments. The disallowance of foreign travel expenses of directors was not justified as there was no family travel, and the excessive HRA paid to the Managing Director was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for further consideration. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357644