<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1338 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357635</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the lease premium paid was capital in nature and not subject to TDS deduction under Sec. 194I. It held that the premium was a capital expenditure for acquiring leasehold rights, distinct from rent. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the First Appellate Authority, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 17:03:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1338 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357635</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the lease premium paid was capital in nature and not subject to TDS deduction under Sec. 194I. It held that the premium was a capital expenditure for acquiring leasehold rights, distinct from rent. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the First Appellate Authority, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal for the Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>