https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357632 Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was granted because the alleged conduct related to 2007-2008, the FIR was filed only in 2017, and no satisfactory explanation for the delay was shown. No incriminating material was recovered during custody, and the prosecution did not identify any public servant specifically influenced by the petitioner. The court treated the disputed consultancy invoice and alleged nexus with associated entities as matters for trial, noted the petitioner's cooperation, social roots, and low flight risk, and held that continued incarceration was not justified. en-us Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Mar 2018 09:21:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357632 Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was granted because the alleged conduct related to 2007-2008, the FIR was filed only in 2017, and no satisfactory explanation for the delay was shown. No incriminating material was recovered during custody, and the prosecution did not identify any public servant specifically influenced by the petitioner. The court treated the disputed consultancy invoice and alleged nexus with associated entities as matters for trial, noted the petitioner's cooperation, social roots, and low flight risk, and held that continued incarceration was not justified. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357632