https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200352 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the District Judge and High Court, granting condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The matter was remitted to the District Judge for a merit-based appeal hearing. Despite ruling in favor of the appellant, the Court ordered payment of costs to respondents 3 to 6 and 9% interest on the compensation amount. The judgment emphasizes adherence to limitation periods, the scope of Article 227 jurisdiction, principles of condonation of delay, and the consequences of legal actions on parties involved. en-us Tue, 06 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Mar 2018 16:12:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200352 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the District Judge and High Court, granting condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The matter was remitted to the District Judge for a merit-based appeal hearing. Despite ruling in favor of the appellant, the Court ordered payment of costs to respondents 3 to 6 and 9% interest on the compensation amount. The judgment emphasizes adherence to limitation periods, the scope of Article 227 jurisdiction, principles of condonation of delay, and the consequences of legal actions on parties involved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200352