<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 881 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200350</link>
    <description>Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 requires deposit of seventy-five per cent of the awarded amount as a mandatory pre-condition for entertaining a challenge to an award or order. The phrase &quot;in the manner directed by the Court&quot; regulates only the mode of deposit, while the proviso allows the Court to control disbursement of the deposited amount to the supplier on reasonable terms; it does not permit waiver of the statutory pre-deposit. The challenge was therefore confined to modification of deposit and interim disbursement directions, while the deposit requirement remained binding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:51:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 881 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200350</link>
      <description>Section 19 of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 requires deposit of seventy-five per cent of the awarded amount as a mandatory pre-condition for entertaining a challenge to an award or order. The phrase &quot;in the manner directed by the Court&quot; regulates only the mode of deposit, while the proviso allows the Court to control disbursement of the deposited amount to the supplier on reasonable terms; it does not permit waiver of the statutory pre-deposit. The challenge was therefore confined to modification of deposit and interim disbursement directions, while the deposit requirement remained binding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>