<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (1) TMI 956 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (FB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200349</link>
    <description>The court upheld the requirement for the petitioner to deposit 75% of the awarded amount as a condition for setting aside an award made by the Industry Facilitation Council under the repealed 1993 Act and subsequent 2006 Act. The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the deposit condition imposed by the District Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The deposit was deemed necessary for the court to proceed with the decision on the application to set aside the award.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (1) TMI 956 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT (FB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200349</link>
      <description>The court upheld the requirement for the petitioner to deposit 75% of the awarded amount as a condition for setting aside an award made by the Industry Facilitation Council under the repealed 1993 Act and subsequent 2006 Act. The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the deposit condition imposed by the District Judge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The deposit was deemed necessary for the court to proceed with the decision on the application to set aside the award.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>